home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT1600>
- <title>
- May 03, 1993: Paul Rudnick:Laughing on the Inside
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- May 03, 1993 Tragedy in Waco
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- PROFILE, Page 66
- Laughing on the Inside Too
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>In a toxic age, writer Paul Rudnick brings the bright light
- of his wit to subjects comic and tragic
- </p>
- <p>By RICHARD CORLISS--With reporting by William Tynan/New York
- </p>
- <p> Father Dan is homosexual, like nearly every other
- character in Jeffrey, Paul Rudnick's rollicking AIDS play. Not
- sex-mad, exact ly--sex-nutty. "Do you know what it's like in
- that confessional?" he rhetorically asks Jeffrey, a Manhattan
- actor-waiter whom the priest has vamped in St. Patrick's
- Cathedral. " `Father, I've had impure thoughts about my soccer
- coach.' Where are the Polaroids? What am I, a mind reader? Say
- six Hail Marys and bring me his shorts!"
- </p>
- <p> Our hero is no less shocked and outraged by this catechism
- of concupiscence than a middle-class Manhattan playgoer might
- be. But because the plague years have forced Jeffrey to retreat
- from sex, or even from expressions of love, he is desperate for
- wisdom from any source. And--surprise!--Father Dan has some
- for him. "Of course life sucks," the cleric says. "It always
- will. So how dare you not make the most of it?...There's
- only one real blasphemy: the refusal of joy! Of a corsage and a
- kiss!"
- </p>
- <p> The speech is vintage Rudnick--a party wine with a
- bouquet of sentiment and the kick of rude truth. To the tart
- social wit of gay writers from Oscar Wilde to Joe Orton he adds
- irrepressible high spirits--a tonic when so much of literature
- has the terminal glums. This Renaissance jester is a yea-sayer,
- a missionary for joy. "Usually when I'm asked why I write," says
- Rudnick, 35, "I reply, `To avoid a day job.' But the truth is
- that there are people in real life I want to honor. It's easy
- to write about despair. It's tough to present optimism
- realistically and appealingly. I think it's a worthwhile goal
- to help people find genuine pleasure without feeling like fools.
- So I do try to celebrate. It doesn't get real Samuel Beckett in
- Paul Rudnickland."
- </p>
- <p> Just now, Rudnickland is a rewarding place to be. Jeffrey,
- a delightful comedy on a tragic theme, is an off-Broadway hit,
- with regional productions and a possible movie sale in the
- offing. Playgoers may be shocked by the NC-17 dialogue, but that
- is just a test. "People in the audience often look fearful,"
- Rudnick says, "that the actors will be coming down the aisles
- to...date them, or something. They think, `I can't take
- this,' and then about 20 seconds later they're laughing."
- </p>
- <p> He has made his mark, if not his name, in movies too.
- Sister Act, the Whoopi Goldberg comedy for which Rudnick wrote
- the original script, was last summer's boffo surprise. Other
- hands diluted the screenplay, which Rudnick eventually signed
- with the pseudonym Joseph Howard; but the movie grossed $140
- million, so now, "although there is no Joseph Howard, his career
- is soaring." Rudnick's uncredited rewrite of The Addams Family
- ($115 million) is "the reason that movie was a hit," says Scott
- Rudin, who produced it and Sister Act and who hired Rudnick to
- write the sequel, Addams Family Values, due out in November.
- Today, with class and mass smashes, Rudnick is hotter than sex
- in the '70s.
- </p>
- <p> So far, he has the glory without the fame. The distinction
- is explained by a character in Rudnick's 1991 Broadway comedy
- I Hate Hamlet: "Fame pays better. Fame has beachfront property.
- Fame needs bodyguards." But Rudnick's pay is fine, thanks. He
- doesn't need Malibu acreage; he has a dashingly ornate
- apartment--one previously tenanted by John Barrymore, just
- like the I Hate Hamlet flat--in Manhattan's Greenwich Village.
- Rudnick would laugh off bodyguards; he is an unguarded fellow
- in an edgy age. "Paul is so charming," says his old friend
- William Ivey Long, a Tony-winning costume designer, "that you
- suspect something is lurking underneath. But amazingly, he
- really is a nice guy."
- </p>
- <p> We couldn't show you the fall line of skeletons in
- Rudnick's closet, because he came out of it long ago. He seems
- wildly well adjusted, at ease with his career, his sexuality,
- his place on earth. He is a happy camper and a nonstop talker;
- he's like a character in his novel Social Disease, who "had
- pledged a lifelong vow of chatter, as surely as Trappists chose
- silence." He writes what he wants, and people like it. He eats
- what he wants--a deplorable diet of M&M's and bagels--yet
- has a slim figure and good teeth. "I have the eating habits of
- a four-year-old," Rudnick says. "I'm fond of anything you'd have
- after school." No wonder the message of Rudnick's most personal
- work (Jeffrey, Social Disease and his other novel, I'll Take It)
- is that the strangest people have the sweetest hearts. You lift
- a rock expecting to find insects, and instead: beachfront.
- </p>
- <p> In the delirious whirl of the Manhattan club scene
- depicted in Social Disease (1986), le plus chic twosome is Guy
- and Venice Huber, dancing their youth away--and, because they
- are Rudnick people, constantly refreshing it. With its Evelyn
- Waugh drawl, Social Disease is Rudnick's revenge on the
- less-than-zilch nightlife novels of the mid-'80s. So I'll Take
- It (1989) must be his anti-Portnoy. A Jewish boy who loves and
- enjoys his mother--call the cops! Paul's mom Selma and her
- sisters Lillian and Hilda are the models for Hedy Reckler and
- her bargain-hunter siblings. The novel is "only" about a New
- England shopping tour, on which Hedy's son Joe hitches a ride.
- But if war novels can teach us about manhood, why can't a
- shopping novel reconcile capitalism and humanism? And do so in
- a voice that merges Jane Austen with a Bloomingdale's catalog?
- I'll Take It is about informed, unconditional family love; this
- makes it rare among modern novels.
- </p>
- <p> Plots eventually intrude in both books--a jail term in
- Social Disease, a heist at L.L. Bean in I'll Take It--but
- these are as unwelcome as the roast beef a heedless hostess
- might plop on Paul's dinner plate. The M&M's of bon mots are the
- real nourishment. Which suggests a criticism of Rudnick's prose:
- it's all candy. Wouldn't a truly serious author hang crape on
- Guy and Venice, or Hedy and her sisters? But Rudnick sees them
- as variations on the Addams family: they may be crazy, but they
- have fun and love each other. And so he loves them.
- </p>
- <p> He feels the same about the Rudnick clan of Pis cataway,
- N.J. Paul's father Norman was a physicist at Gulton Industries,
- which, Paul says, "developed a lot of things that to this day
- I do not understand: capacitors, transistor devices that would
- go into everything from Osterizers to rocket ships." Later he
- edited one of the first textbooks on AIDS. Selma has worked for
- Partisan Review, for the Pennsylvania Ballet and now for a
- Philadelphia concert producer. Paul's older brother Evan, a
- jack-of-all-trades, lives near Ithaca, N.Y. "He has long hair
- and a beard and is very good at all the things that I'm not."
- </p>
- <p> Selma, a big Paul Rudnick fan who has seen Jeffrey three
- times--"Is that more than David Mamet's mother saw Oleanna,
- do you suppose?"--recalls that her son was a clever child.
- "But he was not the Paul we see today," she says, "because
- parents don't really see that. A parent is always trying to get
- a child to do what he doesn't want to do. And Paul's response
- to this was, `No, I won't clean up my room.' At the time, I
- didn't find that particularly witty."
- </p>
- <p> Paul's homosexuality was no big deal to his parents.
- "Although they've always been incredibly supportive," he says,
- "and could not have been more loving and `there' for me, it was
- the kind of thing that wasn't discussed. It was quietly
- acknowledged. I still don't discuss my sex life with my parents,
- and I don't think I would if I were straight either."
- </p>
- <p> He was a good student, who on his SAT tests got "great
- verbal, nonexistent math. I was so bad at math I assumed any
- college would say, `Well, we just won't ask him to add.' " The
- college turned out to be Yale. By now Paul knew he was gay, but
- he didn't worry about the local reaction. "Anyone from Jersey,"
- he says, "would assume everyone at Yale was gay. Once you're
- educated above a certain point, to the rest of the world you're
- a big sissy."
- </p>
- <p> At Yale, Long was already ornamenting the graduate drama
- school. "I was trailing clouds of lavender smoke," he avers,
- "and Paul wanted to catch some of it. We were all sort of larger
- than life--in our own minds." If Rudnick had that self-image,
- he soon grew into it. A few years after graduation, he had his
- own off-Broadway play: Poor Little Lambs, an engaging pastiche
- about Yale's Whiffenpoof singers. Rudnick worked on a movie
- version (never filmed) and was eventually introduced to Rudin,
- his Hollywood mentor. "Over the years," Rudin says, "Paul has
- changed, in a really gratifying way. At the beginning, there was
- this sense that he was not fully committed to being a writer. It
- wasn't so much irresponsible as sort of slightly flaky."
- </p>
- <p> As flaky, perhaps, as Libby Gelman-Waxner, the yenta film
- critic whose column appears in Premiere magazine. Rudnick denies
- he is Libby: "She is a genius. I wouldn't dream of taking
- credit for work of that caliber." He is too modest; the Rudnick
- voice can be heard in every purring line. Example: "Howards End
- transported me, the way movies and catalogs are supposed to; I
- wanted to call up and order Emma's life, Helena's skin and all
- the jewelry."
- </p>
- <p> Rudnick lives alone, he says, "because I'm horribly
- selfish. And when a writer is half of a couple, he gets to be
- the tormented artiste, and the other has to be endlessly
- forgiving and supportive. I wouldn't push that on anyone. Mind
- you, I would welcome a relationship with open arms and clean
- sheets." But he hasn't set his sights on some mythical Mr.
- Right. "I think it's so much better to see what happens. One of
- the wonderful things about love is that it's unpredictable. It
- doesn't involve a quiz or entrance exam."
- </p>
- <p> That is a notion at the heart of Jeffrey, a play that is
- all-funny and all-true. "In many ways it's a liberating play for
- Paul," Selma Rudnick says, "and I'm so happy he was rewarded for
- it. The world doesn't always reward you for taking such great
- leaps." In it Rudnick faces up to the challenge his earlier
- writing implicitly set: how to be sensibly cheerful about a
- disease that ravages homosexuals.
- </p>
- <p> He does this, ingeniously, by embracing two stereotypes
- about gay men. One is that they truly love sex--which gives
- the AIDS tragedy an ironic cruelness. To stay alive, Jeffrey
- renounces sex, only to discover that by cutting himself off from
- his priapic needs, he has cut himself off from life. "Giving up
- sex is absolutely justifiable these days," Rudnick says, "but
- it's also a terrible idea. I think it's a universal truth that
- human contact is an absolute necessity for all people. Whatever
- it takes, whether it's sex, or a hug, or a touch, it's
- critical." Jeffrey's eventual decision to once again embrace
- sex, says Rudnick, "represents a return to humanity."
- </p>
- <p> The second stereotype about gay men is that they are
- naturally artificially witty. "The gay community has a
- flamboyant style of humor that I cherish," Rudnick says. "It's
- a form of gay soul. I hate people who imagine it's simply
- bitchiness or some sort of ghetto response to intolerance. Nah,
- it's much bigger than that, and much more fun." It also provides
- gays with perhaps their sturdiest armor against the gay
- holocaust. And it is this strength Jeffrey so smartly taps. Most
- plays about AIDS, including this year's Pulitzer prizewinner
- Angels in America, send the disease's victims raging or nobly
- wasting away into the bleak night. They can play Lear or
- Camille, but they don't get to do Bette Davis. Rudnick believes
- that "adding to the gloom doesn't help anyone. In fact, you
- should be constantly striving for the reverse. You don't want
- to look up from a hospital bed and see people constantly
- crying." A mope is a most ineffectual nurse.
- </p>
- <p> The author knows this well. Last year, as Norman Rudnick
- was dying of lung cancer, the family gathered at his bedside.
- "Some visitors were very quiet and depressed, with their hands
- folded. But with my mom and my brother and me, I found that the
- more we laughed and behaved normally--the more we
- acknowledged the awfulness but didn't let it become the rule--the more it helped."
- </p>
- <p> It helped Paul that at the end his father read the Jeffrey
- playscript and loved it. "It was such a sad time in our lives,"
- Selma says. "There was no time to speak anything but truthfully.
- We were a very talky family at the end there." She brightens as
- she recalls, "Paul would come in and tell us what was going on--sort of the Scheherazade of the hospital."
- </p>
- <p> So here is Rudnick, spinning his bedside stories to people
- in desperate need of the bright light of his wit. In the age of
- AIDS, there is something heroic about the task he has set
- himself: to put the gay back in gay.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-